<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ex-Christian: Can we, in any sense, &#8220;know God&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/07/01/ex-christian-knowing-about-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/07/01/ex-christian-knowing-about-god/</link>
	<description>Please read, ponder &#038; comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnosticism: The Least Reasonable Position? &#124; Acts of the Apologists</title>
		<link>http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/07/01/ex-christian-knowing-about-god/comment-page-1/#comment-27821</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnosticism: The Least Reasonable Position? &#124; Acts of the Apologists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/07/01/ex-christian-knowing-about-god/#comment-27821</guid>
		<description>[...] I’ve written on agnosticism before and in particular whether the “we cannot know anything about God” hypothesis is a good one, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’ve written on agnosticism before and in particular whether the “we cannot know anything about God” hypothesis is a good one, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Burris</title>
		<link>http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/07/01/ex-christian-knowing-about-god/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Burris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/07/01/ex-christian-knowing-about-god/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t always prove God on paper.

We do know that the things we can&#039;t touch, see, smell, hear or taste are no less real just because we cannot sense them with our 5 physical senses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t always prove God on paper.</p>
<p>We do know that the things we can&#8217;t touch, see, smell, hear or taste are no less real just because we cannot sense them with our 5 physical senses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

