<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My last Da Vinci Code post ever! (Probably!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/12/11/my-last-da-vinci-code-post-ever-probably/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/12/11/my-last-da-vinci-code-post-ever-probably/</link>
	<description>Please read, ponder &#038; comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/12/11/my-last-da-vinci-code-post-ever-probably/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyfaith.com/2006/12/11/my-last-da-vinci-code-post-ever-probably/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Although I&#039;ve had numerous challenges to my faith recently, fortunately the DaVinci Code hasn&#039;t been one of them.  I saw a video that exposed the poor scholarship and outright made-up bunk that is passed off in this book as though it were documented fact.  This is one battle I haven&#039;t had to fight, though there have been others (e.g., people like Bart Ehrman have given me a scare, but that is being balanced out by people like Daniel B. Wallace in my reading -- Ironically, Ehrman, though an unbeliever who has his own set of problems, also blasts the DaVinci for its shoddy scholarship).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;ve had numerous challenges to my faith recently, fortunately the DaVinci Code hasn&#8217;t been one of them.  I saw a video that exposed the poor scholarship and outright made-up bunk that is passed off in this book as though it were documented fact.  This is one battle I haven&#8217;t had to fight, though there have been others (e.g., people like Bart Ehrman have given me a scare, but that is being balanced out by people like Daniel B. Wallace in my reading &#8212; Ironically, Ehrman, though an unbeliever who has his own set of problems, also blasts the DaVinci for its shoddy scholarship).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
