<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naturalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whyfaith.com/2007/02/26/naturalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whyfaith.com/2007/02/26/naturalism/</link>
	<description>Please read, ponder &#038; comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.whyfaith.com/2007/02/26/naturalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1269</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyfaith.com/2007/02/26/naturalism/#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>Wow, is this really Dr. Jones? An honor to have you reading my humble little blog. :) Yup, just to be clear, this is only Greg&#039;s argument as I understood it; I just wished the argument against naturalism (like above) had been fleshed out further in the book. Though I am probably one of the few who is so interested in religious epistemology that he&#039;d want to hear more discussion on that particular topic! :)  I&#039;ve since finished the book, and it has been helpful to understand the reasons behind the naturalistic worldview. Thanks for writing it and publishing it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, is this really Dr. Jones? An honor to have you reading my humble little blog. <img src='http://www.whyfaith.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Yup, just to be clear, this is only Greg&#8217;s argument as I understood it; I just wished the argument against naturalism (like above) had been fleshed out further in the book. Though I am probably one of the few who is so interested in religious epistemology that he&#8217;d want to hear more discussion on that particular topic! <img src='http://www.whyfaith.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;ve since finished the book, and it has been helpful to understand the reasons behind the naturalistic worldview. Thanks for writing it and publishing it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.whyfaith.com/2007/02/26/naturalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyfaith.com/2007/02/26/naturalism/#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the attention given to the book I wrote with Greg Graffin. I&#039;d just like to add that my argument is the same as the one one suggested here (so far as I can tell). I don&#039;t think everything can be known via empirical study. There are other ways of knowing that are also reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the attention given to the book I wrote with Greg Graffin. I&#8217;d just like to add that my argument is the same as the one one suggested here (so far as I can tell). I don&#8217;t think everything can be known via empirical study. There are other ways of knowing that are also reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

