Wed 21 Mar 2007
"Richard Dawkins is not pleased with God" (Well, duh)
Posted by Darren under Apologetics , Atheism , Epistemology , Faith , Naturalism , Philosophy , SkepticsI forgot to post it before, but Alvin Plantinga, one of the foremost philosophers alive today, wrote a review of Dawkins' The God Delusion for Christianity Today magazine recently. Read it here:
» The Dawkins Confusion: Naturalism ad absurdum
The title of the article is groan-worthy, but the article itself is not. Plantinga begins his review by making an important note:
[Dawkins] and [Daniel] Dennett both appear to think it requires considerable courage to attack religion these days … Here it's not easy to take them seriously; religion-bashing in the current Western academy is about as dangerous as endorsing the party's candidate at a Republican rally.
This is one of the initial objections I had to Sam Harris' book, Letter to a Christian Nation: This is not a "Christian nation", it's a secular nation, especially in academia. Dawkins' dismissal of biochemist Michael Behe's work out of hand because "Behe believes in God" is an example of the prevailing academic attitude.* Also, note that in Dawkins' own nation, One third of all Christians say: We've suffered discrimination (Dailymail.co.uk news story).
Also worthy of note, one of my professors at Tyndale University College & Seminary is working on the first North American book in reply to The God Delusion. Alister McGrath's book is already out in the UK (McGrath also teaches at Oxford University; I wonder Dawkins and McGrath have ever bumped into each other on campus?) but I haven't read it yet either, so I don't know how good it is.
For the record, I still haven't read Dawkins' book. I should have time to read non-school related books after I finish my degree this summer.
* This incident is related in more detail, in context, in James W. Sire's excellent book Why Good Arguments Often Fail, p63-64.
2 Responses to “"Richard Dawkins is not pleased with God" (Well, duh)”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
March 22nd, 2007 at 10:24 am
I love Plantinga's written and spoken style! His subtle, dry sense of humor is a nice complement to the profound ideas he develops and expresses. You don't feel like he's some aloof, self-important intellectual up on some tall pedistal; he seems as down-to-earth and accessible as they come. Yet the intellectual content is right up there in the top-drawer with the rest of the high-profile philosophers of the 20th/21st century.
March 22nd, 2007 at 10:01 pm
I agree Jared, he writes with an accessible style. The first time I read one of his articles, I was quite surprised, since the ability to not just know, but to be able to communicate what you know is rather rare for a philosopher. I have a couple of his less accessible books on my "to read" list after I graduate this summer, I'll try "God, Freedom, and Evil" first, if I can handle that "Warranted Christian Belief" will be next. (528 pages!)
(BTW, good to see you're still reading Jared! When will I have the pleasure of reading a blog of your own? )